Guangzhou: Contrast Overload!
-
I hope the government takes action to renovate and improve these areas, making them more comfortable for people to live in.
-
As a migrant worker from another province who has lived in an urban village, I think I have a right to speak. When I first came to Guangzhou, I also lived in such an urban village—not by choice, but because a classmate brought me there. The environment was indeed not great: dark and without sunlight. But in a first-tier city, a 600 yuan rent made me very happy. I saved up a lot of money during that time. After working hard and getting a raise, I moved into a large studio apartment with a riverside balcony for 3,000 yuan a month. I think it's good to keep these places in the city center. Renovations will inevitably lead to rent increases. I can't really accept long commutes from the suburbs. For workers trying to save money, these places are the first choice. Guangzhou is a very inclusive city, which is why it can retain so many people. Although these places are run-down, their low prices offer a foothold for newcomers who are just starting out and whose jobs might not be stable. As for dignity, it's not about these superficial things. As long as you work hard enough and are excellent, your dignity is always there.
-
When I first came to Shenzhen earning a 3,000 yuan salary, I also lived in a small single room in an 8th-floor walk-up for 750 yuan. I lived there for two years before moving into an apartment building with an elevator. Urban villages are really only suitable for a transitional period; if you live there indefinitely, you might lose the ambition to strive for something better.
-
Those who say it's 'suffocating' or 'not fit for humans,' and who look down on these places, can only be described as fortunate, born into better circumstances. But many people in society are not well-off, and who wouldn't want to live in a better place? For them, urban villages are the best option. Is Guangdong very rich? I just feel Guangzhou isn't. If there's money, it should first be used to improve teachers' benefits and spent where it's truly needed. Renovating these areas primarily benefits a small group, while migrant workers and those in need will have one less affordable place to stay.
-
Guangzhou's teacher benefits should be pretty good already.
-
I actually live in an urban village; my home is in the picture you just posted.
-
That's amazing!
-
Which district is this?
-
Haizhu District, perhaps.
-
If they're all renovated, low-income workers won't be able to afford to live in Guangzhou anymore, and Guangzhou will no longer be the inclusive and welcoming city it's known to be.
-
So, should we just never develop then? And let it stay this dirty and chaotic?
-
It's acceptable, I guess!
-
Yuancun?
-
Guangzhou gives off a vibe of being a mix of urban and rural.
-
That's just how it is.